Changes at "Debate 2 - Brussels"
Body (English)
-
+
- Group
- Brussels
- Debate
- Debate 2: Governance & Future Scenarios
- Rapporteur name
- Aleksandra Zietek
- Your organisation
- Eurocities
- What was decided/clarified?
- Focus on internal structure: levels of engagement for non-consortium members, travel/expert budgets, and the need to clarify roles and communications. Proposed solutions included short recap moments, a potential network builder role, and brief initiative pitches to spot synergies.
- Which are the main 3–5 key insights?
- Engagement expectations and support (travel, fees) must be explicit.
- +Communication/role clarity is a current bottleneck.
- +Frequent, lightweight recaps improve alignment.
- +A dedicated network builder could accelerate connections.
- +Short show-and-tell slots surface collaboration opportunities.
- Recommended next steps (max 5)
- Publish a simple engagement charter (roles, supports, expectations).
- +Pilot monthly 5-minute recap recordings.
- +Define/finance a network builder function.
- +Schedule rotating 3-minute pitches from members.
- +Map internal processes to reduce friction.
- Risks/needs to watch
- Overhead without ownership; unclear mandates; engagement fatigue.
- Links to materials (if any)
Title (English)
- +Debate 2 - Brussels